Some of the biggest differentiators between security-focused and regular email are pertinent if you're a large organization or enemy of the state, but could be seen as overkill by everyday users.įor example, server location might only be pertinent if you're an activist who can reasonably expect their communications to be subpoenaed by the government.
What's wrong with those services? Are they not secure? Well, it depends on your threat model and adversary. You probably already use Gmail or Outlook. Security Features to Look for in an Email Service In this piece, we'll talk about what to look for in a secure email service, and then we'll present what we found to be the seven most secure services. Luckily for its four billion users, developers and security researchers are consistently coming up with ways to improve on this old technology for it to be viable and safe in the age of rapid and intelligent attacks. The method these hackers most often use to break in, steal staff identities, and mine trade secrets?Įmail is ancient technology compared to modern team communication tools, and it has technical limitations that make its age a real barrier to security.
Of those 13 million records, a terrifying 96 percent weren't encrypted. 'Plain email is not a secure medium.' - The SANS InstituteĪccording to the Breach Level Index, over 13 million records have leaked or been lost in published cybersecurity breaches since 2013.
